Home The Word Brain Fast Track My Amedeo FAQ About Flying Publisher   

Fast Track

Ear2MemoryFree App | Free PDF | Web
Learning languages on your smartphone
By BSK

Free Abstracts

  Prostate Cancer

  Free Subscription


Articles published in BJU Int

Retrieve available abstracts of 160 articles:
HTML format
Text format



Single Articles


    May 2017
  1. HEDDEN L, Wassersug R, Mahovlich S, Pollock P, et al
    Evaluating an educational intervention to alleviate distress amongst men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and their partners.
    BJU Int. 2017 May 17. doi: 10.1111/bju.13885.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  2. CHIU PKF, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, et al
    Additional benefit of using a risk based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).
    BJU Int. 2017 May 12. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  3. TOSOIAN JT, Chappidi MR, Bishoff JT, Freedland SJ, et al
    Prognostic Utility of Biopsy-Derived Cell Cycle Progression Score in Patients with NCCN Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Treatment Guidance.
    BJU Int. 2017 May 8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13911.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  4. ZUMSTEG ZS, Zelefsky MJ, Woo KM, Spratt DE, et al
    Unification of favorable intermediate, unfavorable intermediate, and very high risk-stratification criteria for prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2017 May 2. doi: 10.1111/bju.13903.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  5. GANDAGLIA G, Fossati N, Dell'Oglio P, Montorsi F, et al
    Is there a role for pure clinical prediction models in prostate cancer in the contemporary era?
    BJU Int. 2017;119:652-653.
    PubMed     Text format    


    April 2017
  6. PROTOPAPA E, van der Meulen J, Moore CM, Smith SC, et al
    Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaires for men who have radical surgery for prostate cancer: a conceptual review of existing instruments.
    BJU Int. 2017 Apr 24. doi: 10.1111/bju.13896.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  7. PARSONS JK, Pierce JP, Mohler J, Paskett E, et al
    The Men's Eating and Living (MEAL) Study (CALGB 70807 [Alliance]): Recruitment Feasibility and Baseline Demographics of a Randomized Trial of Diet in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
    BJU Int. 2017 Apr 24. doi: 10.1111/bju.13890.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  8. CHIEN GW, Slezak JM, Harrison TN, Jung H, et al
    Health-related quality of life outcomes from a contemporary prostate cancer registry in a large diverse population.
    BJU Int. 2017 Apr 19. doi: 10.1111/bju.13843.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  9. CRAWLEY D, Garmo H, Rudman S, Stattin P, et al
    Association between Type 2 diabetes, curative treatment and survival in men with intermediate and high risk localised prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2017 Apr 18. doi: 10.1111/bju.13880.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  10. VIOLET JA, Hofman MS
    Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) from diagnostic to therapeutic target: radionuclide therapy comes of age in prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2017 Apr 5. doi: 10.1111/bju.13871.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  11. EMBERTON M
    An end to the phenomenon of 'upgrading' in early prostate cancer?
    BJU Int. 2017;119:506-507.
    PubMed     Text format    


    March 2017
  12. TELANG JM, Lane BR, Cher ML, Miller DC, et al
    Prostate cancer, family history, and eligibility for active surveillance: A systematic review of the literature.
    BJU Int. 2017 Mar 29. doi: 10.1111/bju.13862.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  13. DIJKSTRA S, Govers TM, Hendriks RJ, Schalken JA, et al
    Cost-effectiveness of a new urinary biomarker-based risk score compared to standard of care in prostate cancer diagnostics - a decision analytical model.
    BJU Int. 2017 Mar 29. doi: 10.1111/bju.13861.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  14. GROGAN J, Gupta R, Mahon KL, Stricker PD, et al
    Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy patients with long-term follow up.
    BJU Int. 2017 Mar 28. doi: 10.1111/bju.13857.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  15. HOWARD LE, Moreira D, De Hoedt A, Aronson WJ, et al
    Cut-points for PSA doubling time in men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2017 Mar 28. doi: 10.1111/bju.13856.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  16. CLEMENT-ZHAO A, Auvray M, Aboudagga H, Blanc-Durand F, et al
    Safety and efficacy of 2-weekly cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2017 Mar 28. doi: 10.1111/bju.13855.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  17. MACLENNAN S, Williamson PR, Bekema H, Campbell M, et al
    A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials.
    BJU Int. 2017 Mar 27. doi: 10.1111/bju.13854.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  18. KANDASWAMY GV, Bennett A, Narahari K, Hughes O, et al
    Establishing the pathways and indications for performing isotope bone scans in newly diagnosed intermediate risk localised prostate cancer - results from a large contemporaneous cohort.
    BJU Int. 2017 Mar 20. doi: 10.1111/bju.13850.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  19. KANTHABALAN A, Peters M, Van Vulpen M, McCartan N, et al
    Focal Salvage HIFU in radiorecurrent prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2017 Mar 4. doi: 10.1111/bju.13831.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    February 2017
  20. SPAHN M, Morlacco A, Boxler S, Joniau S, et al
    Outcome predictors of radical cystectomy in patients with cT4 prostate cancer: A multi-institutional study of 62 patients.
    BJU Int. 2017 Feb 20. doi: 10.1111/bju.13818.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  21. VAN LEEUWEN PJ, Hayen A, Thompson JE, Moses D, et al
    A Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Risk Model to Determine the Risk of Significant Prostate Cancer prior to biopsy.
    BJU Int. 2017 Feb 16. doi: 10.1111/bju.13814.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  22. HAWKEN SR, Auffenberg GB, Miller DC, Lane BR, et al
    Calculating Life Expectancy to Inform Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment Decisions.
    BJU Int. 2017 Feb 15. doi: 10.1111/bju.13812.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  23. VAN DER POEL HG, Wit EM, Acar C, van den Berg NS, et al
    Sentinel node biopsy for prostate cancer: report from a consensus panel meeting.
    BJU Int. 2017 Feb 10. doi: 10.1111/bju.13810.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  24. MURPHY DG, Hofman M, Lawrentschuk N, Maurer T, et al
    Bringing clarity or confusion? The role of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission/computed tomography for primary staging in prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2017;119:194-195.
    PubMed     Text format    


    January 2017
  25. MISRA-HEBERT AD, Hu B, Klein EA, Stephenson A, et al
    Prostate Cancer Screening Practices in a Large, Integrated Health System: 2007-2014.
    BJU Int. 2017 Jan 31. doi: 10.1111/bju.13793.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  26. SHIN T, Smyth TB, Ukimura O, Ahmadi N, et al
    Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasonography Fusion Targeted Biopsy in African-American Men.
    BJU Int. 2017 Jan 23. doi: 10.1111/bju.13786.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  27. PELLEGRINI KL, Sanda MG, Patil D, Long Q, et al
    Evaluation of a 24-Gene Signature for Prognosis of Metastatic Events and Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality.
    BJU Int. 2017 Jan 20. doi: 10.1111/bju.13779.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  28. FAN L, Wang Y, Chenfei C, Pan J, et al
    Chromogranin A and neurone-specific enolase variations during the first three months of abiraterone therapy predict outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2017 Jan 20. doi: 10.1111/bju.13781.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  29. TRABULSI EJ, Tripathi SK, Gomella L, Solomides C, et al
    Development of a Voided Urine Assay for Detecting Prostate Cancer Noninvasively: A Pilot Study.
    BJU Int. 2017 Jan 11. doi: 10.1111/bju.13775.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  30. CROUZET S, Blana A, Murat FJ, Pasticier G, et al
    Salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for locally recurrent prostate cancer after failed radiation therapy: Multi-institutional analysis of 418 patients.
    BJU Int. 2017 Jan 7. doi: 10.1111/bju.13766.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  31. POORTHUIS MH, Vernooij RW, van Moorselaar RJ, de Reijke TM, et al
    First-line non-cytotoxic therapy in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review of ten randomised clinical trials.
    BJU Int. 2017 Jan 6. doi: 10.1111/bju.13764.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  32. TOSOIAN JJ, Druskin SC, Andreas D, Mullane P, et al
    Prostate health index density improves detection of clinically-significant prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2017 Jan 6. doi: 10.1111/bju.13762.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  33. RESCIGNO P, Rodrigues DN, de Bono JS
    Circulating biomarkers of neuroendocrine prostate cancer: an unmet challenge.
    BJU Int. 2017;119:3-4.
    PubMed     Text format    


    December 2016
  34. GHADJAR P, Hayoz S, Genitsch V, Zwahlen DR, et al
    Importance and outcome relevance of central pathology review in prostatectomy specimens: data from the SAKK 09/10 randomized trial on prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Dec 17. doi: 10.1111/bju.13742.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  35. ALBISINNI S, Artigas C, Aoun F, Biaou I, et al
    Clinical impact of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with rising PSA after treatment with curative intent: preliminary analysis of a multidisciplinary approach.
    BJU Int. 2016 Dec 15. doi: 10.1111/bju.13739.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  36. DE CASTRO ABREU AL, Fay CE, Park D, Quinn D, et al
    Robotic Salvage Retroperitoneal and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for "Node-only" Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Technique and Initial Series.
    BJU Int. 2016 Dec 15. doi: 10.1111/bju.13741.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  37. WANG LL, Wallis CJ, Sathianathen N, Lawrentschuk N, et al
    ProtecTion from overtreatment - does a randomised trial finally answer the key question in localised prostate cancer?
    BJU Int. 2016 Dec 8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13734.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    November 2016
  38. GNANAPRAGASAM VJ, Warren AY
    Improving clinical prognostic stratification models for men with prostate cancer: a practical step closer to more individualised care without added costs.
    BJU Int. 2016 Nov 22. doi: 10.1111/bju.13721.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  39. RAUSCHER I, Duwel C, Wirtz M, Schottelius M, et al
    Value of 111 In-PSMA-radioguided surgery for salvage lymphadenectomy in recurrent prostate cancer: correlation with histopathology and clinical follow-up.
    BJU Int. 2016 Nov 10. doi: 10.1111/bju.13713.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  40. HERDEN J, Heidenreich A, Weissbach L
    Risk Stratification - a Tool to predict the Course of Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer?
    BJU Int. 2016 Nov 10. doi: 10.1111/bju.13715.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  41. ESCH L, Fahlbusch M, Albers P, Hautzel H, et al
    11C-acetate PET/CT imaging for detection of recurrent disease following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Nov 8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13706.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  42. POYET C, Hermanns T
    Prostate cancer risk calculators: still much work ahead.
    BJU Int. 2016;118:670-671.
    PubMed     Text format    


  43. ROCCO B, Boeri L
    Prostate cancer gene 3 assay in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasonography fusion target biopsy era: a future to believe in.
    BJU Int. 2016;118:672-673.
    PubMed     Text format    


  44. DE LUCA S, Passera R, Cattaneo G, Manfredi M, et al
    High prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) scores are associated with elevated Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) grade and biopsy Gleason score, at magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion software-based targeted prostate biopsy af
    BJU Int. 2016;118:723-730.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    October 2016
  45. GILBERT DC, Duong T, Kynaston HG, Alhasso AA, et al
    Quality of life outcomes from the PATCH trial evaluating LHRH agonists versus transdermal oestradiol for androgen suppression in advanced prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Oct 18. doi: 10.1111/bju.13687.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  46. TILKI D, Preisser F, Tennstedt P, Tober P, et al
    Adjuvant radiation therapy is associated with better oncological outcome compared to salvage radiation therapy in patients with pN1 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
    BJU Int. 2016 Oct 15. doi: 10.1111/bju.13679.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  47. LOEB S, Shin SS, Broyles DL, Wei JT, et al
    Prostate Health Index (phi) Improves Multivariable Risk Prediction of Aggressive Prostate Cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Oct 15. doi: 10.1111/bju.13676.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  48. CORFIELD J, Crozier J, Joshua A, Bolton D, et al
    Understanding the role of new systemic agents in the treatment of prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Oct 6. doi: 10.1111/bju.13633.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  49. COONEY KA, Beebe-Dimmer JL
    HOXB13 mutations and prostate cancer risk.
    BJU Int. 2016;118:496-7.
    PubMed     Text format    


  50. MEREDITH G, Wong D, Yaxley J, Coughlin G, et al
    The use of 68 Ga-PSMA PET CT in men with biochemical recurrence after definitive treatment of acinar prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016;118 Suppl 3:49-55.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  51. MATARAZA JM, Gotwals P
    Recent advances in immuno-oncology and its application to urological cancers.
    BJU Int. 2016;118:506-14.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  52. DEVECI S, Gotto GT, Alex B, O'Brien K, et al
    A survey of patient expectations regarding sexual function following radical prostatectomy.
    BJU Int. 2016;118:641-5.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  53. WYSOCK JS, Mendhiratta N, Zattoni F, Meng X, et al
    Predictive value of negative 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on 12-core biopsy results.
    BJU Int. 2016;118:515-20.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  54. MURRAY NP, Aedo S, Reyes E, Orellana N, et al
    Prediction model for early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy based on the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score and the presence of secondary circulating prostate cells.
    BJU Int. 2016;118:556-62.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    September 2016
  55. YAXLEY JW, Lah K, Yaxley JP, Gardiner RA, et al
    Long term outcome of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer with a median follow up of 10 years.
    BJU Int. 2016 Sep 15. doi: 10.1111/bju.13659.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  56. HOFHEINZ RD, Lange C, Ecke T, Kloss S, et al
    Quality of life and pain relief in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer on cabazitaxel: the non-interventional QoLiTime study.
    BJU Int. 2016 Sep 12. doi: 10.1111/bju.13658.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  57. BRANGER N, Maubon T, Traumann M, Thomassin-Piana J, et al
    Is a negative mpMRI really able to rule out significant prostate cancer?: The real life experience.
    BJU Int. 2016 Sep 12. doi: 10.1111/bju.13657.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  58. LOEB S, Curnyn C, Fagerlin A, Braithwaite RS, et al
    A Qualitative Study on Decision-Making by Prostate Cancer Physicians during Active Surveillance.
    BJU Int. 2016 Sep 9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13651.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  59. MARTORANA E, Pirola GM, Scialpi M, Micali S, et al
    Lesion volume predicts prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness: validation of its value alone and matched with PIRADS score.
    BJU Int. 2016 Sep 8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13649.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  60. EGEVAD L, Samaratunga H, Srigley JR, Delahunt B, et al
    Consensus guidelines for reporting prostate cancer Gleason Grade.
    BJU Int. 2016;118:E1-2.
    PubMed     Text format    


  61. JOHNSON MH
    Tailored prostate cancer survivorship: one size does not fit all.
    BJU Int. 2016;118:343-4.
    PubMed     Text format    


  62. EHDAIE B
    Active surveillance for prostate cancer: is it too active?
    BJU Int. 2016;118:343.
    PubMed     Text format    


    August 2016
  63. WILLIAMS SB, Chamie K, Duan Z, Hoffman KE, et al
    Risk of Hospitalization Following Primary Treatment for Prostate Cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Aug 25. doi: 10.1111/bju.13647.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  64. MCDANIEL AS, Ferraldeschi R, Krupa R, Landers M, et al
    Phenotypic diversity of circulating tumour cells in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Aug 18. doi: 10.1111/bju.13631.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  65. BECKMANN KR, O'Callaghan ME, Ruseckaite R, Kinnear N, et al
    Prostate cancer outcomes for men who present with symptoms at diagnosis.
    BJU Int. 2016 Aug 4. doi: 10.1111/bju.13622.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  66. HANSEN NL, Barrett T, Koo B, Doble A, et al
    The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting.
    BJU Int. 2016 Aug 4. doi: 10.1111/bju.13619.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  67. PATEL VR, Palayapalayam Ganapathi H
    Management dilemmas in low-risk prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016;118:180-1.
    PubMed     Text format    


  68. FLAMIATOS JF, Beer TM, Graff JN, Eilers KM, et al
    COX-2 Inhibition for Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention: Double-Blind Randomized Study of Pre-Prostatectomy Celecoxib or Placebo.
    BJU Int. 2016 Aug 1. doi: 10.1111/bju.13612.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available



  69. Abstracts of the 17th Asia-Pacific Prostate Cancer Conference 2016, Australia, 31 August-3 September 2016.
    BJU Int. 2016;118 Suppl 1:6-42.
    PubMed     Text format    



  70. Welcome for APCC BJUi Supplement Embracing a precision approach to prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016;118 Suppl 1:5.
    PubMed     Text format    


    July 2016
  71. MAYER EN, Tward JD, Bassett M, Lenherr SM, et al
    Management of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 4 urinary adverse events (UAEs) from radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Jul 28. doi: 10.1111/bju.13607.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  72. EMERY JD, Jefford M, King M, Hayne D, et al
    The ProCare Trial: a phase II randomised controlled trial of shared care for follow-up of men with prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Jul 19. doi: 10.1111/bju.13593.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  73. HEGEMANN M, Stenzl A, Bedke J, Chi KN, et al
    Liquid biopsy: ready to guide therapy in advanced prostate cancer?
    BJU Int. 2016 Jul 19. doi: 10.1111/bju.13586.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  74. LANE JA, Metcalfe C, Young GJ, Peters TJ, et al
    Patient-reported outcomes in the ProtecT randomised trial of clinically localised prostate cancer treatments: design and baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function and quality of life.
    BJU Int. 2016 Jul 14. doi: 10.1111/bju.13582.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  75. ZHANG BY, Riska SM, Mahoney DW, Costello BA, et al
    Germline Genetic Variation in JAK2 as a Prognostic Marker in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Jul 13. doi: 10.1111/bju.13584.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  76. DEBRUYNE FM, Behre HM, Roehrborn CG, Maggi M, et al
    Testosterone treatment is not associated with increased risk of prostate cancer or worsening of lower urinary tract symptoms: Prostate health outcomes in the Registry of Hypogonadism in Men (RHYME).
    BJU Int. 2016 Jul 13. doi: 10.1111/bju.13578.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  77. LEYH-BANNURAH SR, Abou-Haidar H, Dell'Oglio P, Schiffmann J, et al
    Primary Gleason Pattern Upgrading in contemporary D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer patients: Implications for future biomarkers and imaging modalities.
    BJU Int. 2016 Jul 1. doi: 10.1111/bju.13570.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    June 2016
  78. ANDRONIS L, Goranitis I, Pirrie S, Pope A, et al
    Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid and strontium-89 as bone protecting treatments in addition to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic castrate-refractory prostate cancer: results from the TRAPEZE trial (ISRCTN 12808747).
    BJU Int. 2016 Jun 3. doi: 10.1111/bju.13549.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  79. ZIETMAN A, Smith J, Klein E, Droller M, et al
    Consensus guidelines for reporting prostate cancer Gleason Grade.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:849.
    PubMed     Text format    


  80. ANDERSON CB, Tin AL, Sjoberg DD, Mulhall JP, et al
    Association between number of prostate biopsies and patient-reported functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: implications for active surveillance protocols.
    BJU Int. 2016;117.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  81. DE NUNZIO C, Presicce F, Lombardo R, Cancrini F, et al
    Physical activity as a risk factor for prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective biopsy cohort analysis.
    BJU Int. 2016;117.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  82. DINH KT, Mahal BA, Ziehr DR, Muralidhar V, et al
    Risk of prostate cancer mortality in men with a history of prior cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016;117.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  83. WATSON E, Shinkins B, Frith E, Neal D, et al
    Symptoms, unmet needs, psychological well-being and health status in survivors of prostate cancer: implications for redesigning follow-up.
    BJU Int. 2016;117.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    May 2016
  84. DE CARVALHO TM, Heijnsdijk EA, de Koning HJ
    Estimating the risks and benefits of Active Surveillance protocols for Prostate Cancer: A microsimulation study.
    BJU Int. 2016 May 25. doi: 10.1111/bju.13542.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  85. WINTER A, Sirri E, Jansen L, Wawroschek F, et al
    Comparison of prostate cancer survival in Germany and the United States: Can differences be attributed to differences in stage distributions?
    BJU Int. 2016 May 21. doi: 10.1111/bju.13537.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  86. VAN LEEUWEN PJ, Emmett L, Ho B, Delprado W, et al
    Prospective Evaluation of 68Gallium-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Preoperative Lymph Node Staging in Prostate Cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 May 21. doi: 10.1111/bju.13540.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  87. DURAND M, Jain M, Robinson B, Aronowitz E, et al
    Magnetic Resonance Microscopy May Enable Distinction Between Normal Histomorphological Features and Prostate Cancer in the Resected Prostate Gland.
    BJU Int. 2016 May 7. doi: 10.1111/bju.13523.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  88. RAISON N, Elhage O, Dasgupta P
    Getting Personal with Prostate Cancer: DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 May 7. doi: 10.1111/bju.13522.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  89. PATEL U, Dasgupta P, Challacombe B, Cahill D, et al
    Pre-biopsy 3T MRI and targeted biopsy of the index prostate cancer - correlation with robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
    BJU Int. 2016 May 7. doi: 10.1111/bju.13525.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  90. GORIN MA, Pomper MG, Rowe SP
    PSMA-targeted imaging of prostate cancer: the best is yet to come.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:715-6.
    PubMed     Text format    


  91. CUSSANS A, Somani BK, Basarab A, Dudderidge TJ, et al
    The role of targeted prophylactic antimicrobial therapy before transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy in reducing infection rates: a systematic review.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:725-31.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    April 2016
  92. FODOR A, Berardi G, Fiorino C, Picchio M, et al
    Toxicity and efficacy of salvage 11C-Choline PET/CT-guided radiation therapy in patients with prostate cancer lymph nodal recurrence.
    BJU Int. 2016 Apr 22. doi: 10.1111/bju.13510.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  93. BOKHORST LP, Zappa M, Carlsson SV, Kwiatkowski M, et al
    Correlation between stage shift and differences in mortality in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).
    BJU Int. 2016 Apr 22. doi: 10.1111/bju.13505.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  94. WHITING PF, Moore TH, Jameson CM, Davies P, et al
    Symptomatic and quality of life outcomes following treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer: a systematic review.
    BJU Int. 2016 Apr 18. doi: 10.1111/bju.13499.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  95. SELKIRK CG, Helfand BT
    To PSA or not to PSA? Still a question for men with a family history of prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:545.
    PubMed     Text format    


  96. ERNSTMANN N, Weissbach L, Herden J, Winter N, et al
    Patient-physician-communication and health related quality of life of localized prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy - a longitudinal multilevel analysis.
    BJU Int. 2016 Apr 1. doi: 10.1111/bju.13495.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  97. WONG LM, Tang V, Peters J, Costello A, et al
    Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort.
    BJU Int. 2016;117 Suppl 4:82-7.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  98. DELAHUNT B, Egevad L, Grignon DJ, Srigley JR, et al
    Prostate cancer grading: recent developments and future directions.
    BJU Int. 2016;117 Suppl 4:7-8.
    PubMed     Text format    


  99. LAWRENTSCHUK N
    PSA testing and early management of test-detected prostate cancer- consensus at last.
    BJU Int. 2016;117 Suppl 4:5-6.
    PubMed     Text format    


  100. RASTINEHAD AR, Durand M
    A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion guided prostate biopsy devices: too many uncontrolled variables.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:548-9.
    PubMed     Text format    


  101. CULIG Z
    New possibilities for urinary molecular diagnostics.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:547-8.
    PubMed     Text format    


  102. SUN M, Trinh QD
    A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database malfunction: perceptions, pitfalls and verities.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:551-2.
    PubMed     Text format    


  103. SELES M, Gutschi T, Mayrhofer K, Fischereder K, et al
    Sampling of the anterior apical region results in increased cancer detection and upgrading in transrectal repeat saturation biopsy of the prostate.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:592-7.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  104. KAMRAVA M, Hegde JV, Abgaryan N, Chang E, et al
    Does the addition of targeted prostate biopsies to standard systemic biopsies influence treatment management for radiation oncologists?
    BJU Int. 2016;117:584-91.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  105. ANG M, Rajcic B, Foreman D, Moretti K, et al
    Men presenting with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of over 100 ng/mL.
    BJU Int. 2016;117 Suppl 4:68-75.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  106. CHEN EC, Papa N, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton D, et al
    Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism after pelvic uro-oncologic surgery--a single center experience.
    BJU Int. 2016;117 Suppl 4:50-3.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    March 2016
  107. HAGGSTROM C, Stattin P, Stocks T, Garmo H, et al
    Interpretation of conventional survival analysis and competing risk analysis: An example of hypertension and prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Mar 31. doi: 10.1111/bju.13494.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  108. HECK MM, Thaler MA, Schmid SC, Seitz AK, et al
    Chromogranin A and neuron-specific enolase serum levels as predictors of treatment outcome in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients under abiraterone therapy.
    BJU Int. 2016 Mar 31. doi: 10.1111/bju.13493.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  109. SPRATT DE, Cole AI, Palapattu GS, Weizer AZ, et al
    Independent Surgical Validation of the New Prostate Cancer Grade Grouping System.
    BJU Int. 2016 Mar 24. doi: 10.1111/bju.13488.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  110. SHIOTA M, Yokomizo A, Takeuchi A, Kiyoshima K, et al
    Steroid co-introduction with docetaxel chemotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer affects PSA flare.
    BJU Int. 2016 Mar 17. doi: 10.1111/bju.13483.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  111. SHORE ND, Chu F, Moul J, Saltzstein D, et al
    ATRIGEL polymer-delivered subcutaneous leuprolide acetate formulations achieve and maintain castrate levels of testosterone in four open label studies in advanced prostate cancer patients.
    BJU Int. 2016 Mar 17. doi: 10.1111/bju.13482.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  112. BORKOWETZ A, Platzek I, Toma M, Renner T, et al
    Direct comparison of multiparametric MRI and final histopathology in patients with proven prostate cancer in MRI/Ultrasound-fusion biopsy.
    BJU Int. 2016 Mar 2. doi: 10.1111/bju.13461.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  113. COLE AP, Leow JJ, Trinh QD
    New evidence from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial may exculpate cyclooxygenase (COX) blockers in erectile dysfunction.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:385-6.
    PubMed     Text format    


  114. LUNDON DJ
    Prostate cancer risk prediction and the persistence of uncertainty.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:382.
    PubMed     Text format    


  115. ROOBOL MJ
    Where we are with screening and risk prediction for prostate cancer in 2016.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:381.
    PubMed     Text format    


  116. LOEB S
    Prostate biopsy decisions: one-size-fits-all approach with total PSA is out and a multivariable approach with the Prostate Health Index is in.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:383.
    PubMed     Text format    


  117. NAMIKI S, Mitsuzuka K, Kaiho Y, Yamada S, et al
    Serum luteinizing hormone concentration is significantly associated with recovery of urinary function after radical prostatectomy.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:450-5.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  118. MAI Z, Yan W, Zhou Y, Zhou Z, et al
    Transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy: 10 years of experience.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:424-9.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    February 2016
  119. DE LA TAILLE A, Martinez-Pineiro L, Cabri P, Houchard A, et al
    Factors predicting progression to castrate-resistant prostate cancer in patients with advanced prostate cancer receiving long-term androgen deprivation therapy.
    BJU Int. 2016 Feb 25. doi: 10.1111/bju.13455.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  120. VAN DIE MD, Bone KM, Emery J, Williams SG, et al
    Phytotherapeutic interventions in the management of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review of randomised trials.
    BJU Int. 2016 Feb 22. doi: 10.1111/bju.13361.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  121. GOODALL PP, Little J, Robinson E, Trimble I, et al
    Initial experience of an algorithm-based protocol for the community follow-up of men with prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Feb 15. doi: 10.1111/bju.13446.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  122. EVANS SM, Nag N, Roder D, Brooks A, et al
    Development of an International Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry.
    BJU Int. 2016 Feb 15. doi: 10.1111/bju.13258.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  123. CARLSSON S, Jaderling F, Wallerstedt A, Nyberg T, et al
    Oncologic and functional outcomes one year after radical prostatectomy for very low risk prostate cancer. Results from the prospective LAPPRO trial.
    BJU Int. 2016 Feb 11. doi: 10.1111/bju.13444.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  124. JEFFERIES ER, Bahl A, Hounsome L, Eylert MF, et al
    Admissions to hospital due to fracture in England in prostate cancer patients treated with Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) - do we have to worry about the hormones?
    BJU Int. 2016 Feb 6. doi: 10.1111/bju.13441.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  125. FOLEY RW, Maweni RM, Gorman L, Murphy K, et al
    The ERSPC Risk Calculators Significantly Outperform The PCPT 2.0 In The Prediction Of Prostate Cancer; A Multi-Institutional Study.
    BJU Int. 2016 Feb 2. doi: 10.1111/bju.13437.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  126. YAP SA
    Should we worry about positive surgical margins in prostate cancer?
    BJU Int. 2016;117:207-8.
    PubMed     Text format    


    January 2016
  127. RUDMAN SM, Gray KP, Batista JL, Pitt MJ, et al
    Risk of prostate cancer specific death in men with baseline metabolic aberrations treated with androgen deprivation therapy for biochemical recurrence.
    BJU Int. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1111/bju.13428.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  128. MADAN RA, Karzai FH, Ning YM, Adesunloye BA, et al
    Phase II Trial of Docetaxel, Bevacizumab, Lenalidomide, and Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Jan 18. doi: 10.1111/bju.13412.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  129. BOYLE P, Koechlin A, Bota M, d'Onofrio A, et al
    Endogenous and exogenous testosterone and the risk of prostate cancer and increased prostate specific antigen (PSA): a meta-analysis.
    BJU Int. 2016 Jan 18. doi: 10.1111/bju.13417.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  130. STOREBJERG TM, Hoyer S, Kirkegaard P, Bro F, et al
    Prevalence of the HOXB13 G84E mutation in Danish men treated by radical prostatectomy and correlations with prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness.
    BJU Int. 2016 Jan 18. doi: 10.1111/bju.13416.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  131. BOKHORST LP, Lepisto I, Kakehi Y, Bangma CH, et al
    Complications after prostate biopsies in men on active surveillance and its effect on receiving further biopsies in the Prostate cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) study.
    BJU Int. 2016 Jan 14. doi: 10.1111/bju.13410.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  132. FREEDLAND SJ, Howard LE, Hanyok BT, Kadiyala VK, et al
    Validation of a bone scan positivity risk table in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016 Jan 13. doi: 10.1111/bju.13405.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  133. VELTRI RW
    Serum marker %[-2]proPSA and the Prostate Health Index improve diagnostic accuracy for clinically relevant prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:12-13.
    PubMed     Text format    


  134. EMBERTON M
    Doubling our precision of risk stratification in early prostate cancer: too good to be true?
    BJU Int. 2016;117:8-9.
    PubMed     Text format    


  135. CHANDRASEKAR T, Evans CP
    Salvage radical prostatectomy: a few good men.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:9-10.
    PubMed     Text format    


  136. WILLIAMS SB, Bozkurt Y, Achim M, Achim G, et al
    Sequencing robot-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection prior to radical prostatectomy: a step-by-step guide to exposure and efficiency.
    BJU Int. 2016;117:192-8.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    December 2015
  137. GILSON C, Sydes MR, Chowdhury S
    Will chemotherapy change the management of prostate cancer?
    BJU Int. 2015 Dec 22. doi: 10.1111/bju.13400.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  138. VAN LEEUWEN PJ, Stricker P, Hruby G, Kneebone A, et al
    68Ga-PSMA has high detection rate of prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa in patients being considered for salvage radiation treatment.
    BJU Int. 2015 Dec 18. doi: 10.1111/bju.13397.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  139. EMBERTON M
    Are men who are biopsied without prior prostate magnetic resonance imaging getting substandard care?
    BJU Int. 2015;116:837-9.
    PubMed     Text format    


  140. HANSKE J, Meyer CP, Trinh QD
    How can we improve surgical outcomes?
    BJU Int. 2015;116:835-6.
    PubMed     Text format    


  141. ALBERTSEN PC
    Surgery is possible: now let's prove its superior efficacy!
    BJU Int. 2015;116:834-5.
    PubMed     Text format    


  142. BAHL A, Masson S, Malik Z, Birtle AJ, et al
    Final quality of life and safety data for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with cabazitaxel in the UK Early Access Programme (EAP) (NCT01254279).
    BJU Int. 2015;116:880-7.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  143. NOVARA G, Ficarra V, Zattoni F, Fedeli U, et al
    Recourse to radical prostatectomy and associated short-term outcomes in Italy: a country-wide study over the last decade.
    BJU Int. 2015;116:862-7.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  144. MONTORSI F, Gandaglia G, Briganti A
    Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Where do we stand?
    BJU Int. 2015;116:845-6.
    PubMed     Text format    


  145. SCHMID M, Ghani KR, Choueiri TK, Sood A, et al
    An evaluation of the 'weekend effect' in patients admitted with metastatic prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2015;116:911-9.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  146. TULIAO PH, Koo KC, Komninos C, Chang CH, et al
    Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    BJU Int. 2015;116:897-904.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  147. MOORE CM, Azzouzi AR, Barret E, Villers A, et al
    Determination of optimal drug dose and light dose index to achieve minimally invasive focal ablation of localised prostate cancer using WST11-vascular-targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy.
    BJU Int. 2015;116:888-96.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    November 2015
  148. ONG WL, Evans SM, Spelman T, Kearns PA, et al
    Comparison of oncological and health related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes between open (ORP) and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for localized prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry (P
    BJU Int. 2015 Nov 17. doi: 10.1111/bju.13380.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  149. ROLLE L, Falcone M, Ceruti C, Timpano M, et al
    A prospective multicentric international study on the surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction rates of the "Sliding Technique" for end-stage Peyronie's disease with severe shortening of the penis and erectile dysfunction.
    BJU Int. 2015 Nov 11. doi: 10.1111/bju.13370.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  150. ALBERTSEN PC
    Does a positive margin always mandate adjuvant radiotherapy?
    BJU Int. 2015;116:677-8.
    PubMed     Text format    


  151. LOEB S, Ribal MJ
    Controversies in management of high-risk prostate and bladder cancer.
    BJU Int. 2015;116:675.
    PubMed     Text format    


  152. KUMAR A, Samavedi S, Bates AS, Coelho RF, et al
    Continence outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with adverse urinary continence risk factors.
    BJU Int. 2015;116:764-70.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  153. HSU CC, Paciorek AT, Cooperberg MR, Roach M 3rd, et al
    Postoperative radiation therapy for patients at high-risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy: does timing matter?
    BJU Int. 2015;116:713-20.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  154. MELVIN JC, Garmo H, Daniel R, Shanmugalingam T, et al
    An investigation into the relationship between statins and cancer using population-based data.
    BJU Int. 2015;116:681-3.
    PubMed     Text format    


    October 2015
  155. MATSUSHITA K, Kent MT, Vickers AJ, von Bodman C, et al
    Preoperative predictive model of recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.
    BJU Int. 2015;116:577-83.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  156. SCOTT S, Samaratunga H, Chabert C, Breckenridge M, et al
    Is transperineal prostate biopsy more accurate than transrectal biopsy in determining final Gleason score and clinical risk category? A comparative analysis.
    BJU Int. 2015;116 Suppl 3:26-30.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  157. MCCOMBIE SP, Hawks C, Emery JD, Hayne D, et al
    A 'One Stop' Prostate Clinic for rural and remote men: a report on the first 200 patients.
    BJU Int. 2015;116 Suppl 3:11-7.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  158. ROTH H, Millar JL, Cheng AC, Byrne A, et al
    The state of TRUS biopsy sepsis: readmissions to Victorian hospitals with TRUS biopsy-related infection over 5 years.
    BJU Int. 2015;116 Suppl 3:49-53.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  159. SUNDI D, Han M
    Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: feasible but oncological equivalence unproven.
    BJU Int. 2015;116 Suppl 3:89-91.
    PubMed     Text format    


    May 2015
  160. CARLSSON S, Drevin L, Loeb S, Widmark A, et al
    Population-based study of long-term functional outcomes after prostate cancer treatment.
    BJU Int. 2015 May 8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13179.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


Thank you for your interest in scientific medicine.


AMEDEO Prostate Cancer is free of charge.
This policy is made possible thanks to a media sponsorship by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Design: