Home Fast Track My Amedeo FAQ About Flying Publisher   

Fast Track

Hepatology 2012 (546 pages, free PDF)
Hepatitis C 2012 (150 pages, free PDF)

Free Medical Books

  Breast Cancer

  Free Subscription


Articles published in AJR Am J Roentgenol

Retrieve available abstracts of 64 articles:
HTML format
Text format



Single Articles


    May 2012
  1. SHIN HJ , Baek HM, Cha JH, Kim HH, et al
    Evaluation of Breast Cancer Using Proton MR Spectroscopy: Total Choline Peak Integral and Signal-to-Noise Ratio as Prognostic Indicators.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:W488-97.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  2. KREMER ME , Downs-Holmes C, Novak RD, Lyons JA, et al
    Neglecting to screen women between the ages of 40 and 49 years with mammography: what is the impact on breast cancer diagnosis?
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:1218-22.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



    March 2012
  3. ADEJOLU M , Huo L, Rohren E, Santiago L, et al
    False-Positive Lesions Mimicking Breast Cancer on FDG PET and PET/CT.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:W304-14.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  4. CHECKA CM , Chun JE, Schnabel FR, Lee J, et al
    The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:W292-5.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  5. VILAR VS , Goldman SM, Ricci MD, Pincerato K, et al
    Analysis by MRI of residual tumor after radiofrequency ablation for early stage breast cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:W285-91.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  6. HENDRICK RE , Helvie MA
    Mammography screening: a new estimate of number needed to screen to prevent one breast cancer death.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:723-8.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  7. HIRANO M , Satake H, Ishigaki S, Ikeda M, et al
    Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast masses: comparison of diagnostic performance using various apparent diffusion coefficient parameters.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:717-22.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  8. NISHIKAWA RM , Schmidt RA, Linver MN, Edwards AV, et al
    Clinically missed cancer: how effectively can radiologists use computer-aided detection?
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:708-16.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



    February 2012
  9. LEE KA , Zuley ML, Chivukula M, Choksi ND, et al
    Risk of malignancy when microscopic radial scars and microscopic papillomas are found at percutaneous biopsy.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:W141-5.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  10. KRISHNAMURTHY S , Bevers T, Kuerer H, Yang WT, et al
    Multidisciplinary considerations in the management of high-risk breast lesions.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:W132-40.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  11. CHANSAKUL T , Lai KC, Slanetz PJ
    The postconservation breast: part 2, imaging findings of tumor recurrence and other long-term sequelae.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:331-43.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  12. CHANSAKUL T , Lai KC, Slanetz PJ
    The postconservation breast: part 1, expected imaging findings.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:321-30.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  13. RAUCH GM , Dogan BE, Smith TB, Liu P, et al
    Outcome Analysis of 9-Gauge MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Core Needle Breast Biopsies.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:292-9.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  14. IBRAHIM N , Bessissow A, Lalonde L, Mesurolle B, et al
    Surgical outcome of biopsy-proven lobular neoplasia: is there any difference between lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia?
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:288-91.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  15. DESTOUNIS SV , Murphy PF, Seifert PJ, Somerville PA, et al
    Management of patients diagnosed with lobular carcinoma in situ at needle core biopsy at a community-based outpatient facility.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:281-7.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  16. LINDA A , Zuiani C, Furlan A, Lorenzon M, et al
    Nonsurgical management of high-risk lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: can malignancy be ruled out safely with breast MRI?
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:272-80.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  17. EIADA R , Chong J, Kulkarni S, Goldberg F, et al
    Papillary lesions of the breast: MRI, ultrasound, and mammographic appearances.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:264-71.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  18. GEORGIAN-SMITH D , Lawton TJ
    Variations in physician recommendations for surgery after diagnosis of a high-risk lesion on breast core needle biopsy.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:256-63.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  19. HELLER SL , Moy L
    Imaging features and management of high-risk lesions on contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MRI.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:249-55.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  20. JAVITT MC
    Diagnosis and management of high-risk breast lesions: Aristotle's dilemma.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:246-8.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



    January 2012
  21. BERG WA , Madsen KS, Schilling K, Tartar M, et al
    Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:219-32.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  22. HORVATH E , Silva C, Fasce G, Ferrari C, et al
    Parallel artery and vein: sign of benign nature of breast masses.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:W76-82.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  23. WEIGERT JM , Bertrand ML, Lanzkowsky L, Stern LH, et al
    Results of a multicenter patient registry to determine the clinical impact of breast-specific gamma imaging, a molecular breast imaging technique.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:W69-75.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  24. HALL FM
    Digital mammography versus full-field digital mammography.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:240.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



  25. RANGER B , Littrup PJ, Duric N, Chandiwala-Mody P, et al
    Breast ultrasound tomography versus MRI for clinical display of anatomy and tumor rendering: preliminary results.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:233-9.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



    December 2011
  26. ROMERO C , Almenar A, Pinto JM, Varela C, et al
    Impact on breast cancer diagnosis in a multidisciplinary unit after the incorporation of mammography digitalization and computer-aided detection systems.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:1492-7.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  27. GEISER WR , Haygood TM, Santiago L, Stephens T, et al
    Challenges in mammography: part 1, artifacts in digital mammography.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W1023-30.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  28. EL KHOULI RH , Macura KJ, Kamel IR, Jacobs MA, et al
    3-T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: pharmacokinetic parameters versus conventional kinetic curve analysis.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:1498-505.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



    November 2011
  29. SINCLAIR N , Littenberg B, Geller B, Muss H, et al
    Accuracy of screening mammography in older women.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:1268-73.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



    October 2011
  30. HUBBARD R , Kerlikowske K, Buist D, Yankaskas B, et al
    Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening Strategies Must Be Based on Comparison of Harms and Benefits.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W793.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



  31. LE-PETROSS HT , Cristofanilli M, Carkaci S, Krishnamurthy S, et al
    MRI Features of Inflammatory Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W769-W776.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  32. VILLA A , Tagliafico A, Chiesa F, Chiaramondia M, et al
    Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy performed on suspicious clustered microcalcifications: could patients without residual microcalcifications be managed conservatively?
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:1012-8.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  33. BASMA S , Lord B, Jacks LM, Rizk M, et al
    Error Rates in Breast Imaging Reports: Comparison of Automatic Speech Recognition and Dictation Transcription.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:923-927.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  34. MANDELBLATT J , Cronin K
    Response to Hendrick and Helvie by the Cancer Intervention Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Breast Working Group.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W792.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



  35. LOBB A
    Screening Mammography, Patient Decision-Making, and Absolute Risks.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W791.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



    September 2011
  36. COHEN Y , Gekhtman D, Strano S
    Mammography-sonography concordance.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:765.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



  37. HALL FM , Mehta TS, Magaram D
    Sonographic confirmation of mammographic abnormality.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:764.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



  38. SHIN HJ , Kim HH, Cha JH, Park JH, et al
    Automated ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis: interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:747-54.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  39. SOLORZANO S , Mesurolle B, Omeroglu A, El Khoury M, et al
    Flat epithelial atypia of the breast: pathological-radiological correlation.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:740-6.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  40. MOON JH , Kim HH, Shin HJ, Kim H, et al
    Supplemental use of optical diffusion breast imaging for differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:732-9.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  41. PARK J
    Triangulation of breast lesions.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W547.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



    July 2011
  42. BEDI DG
    Axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer: ultrasound appearance.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W194.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



  43. ADEJOLU M , Wu Y, Santiago L, Yang WT, et al
    Adenomyoepithelial tumors of the breast: imaging findings with histopathologic correlation.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W184-90.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



    June 2011
  44. CLAPP AJ , Peller PJ, Subramaniam RM
    AJR teaching file: incidental breast cancer detected with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



  45. KIM JA , Son EJ, Youk JH, Kim EK, et al
    MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1450-6.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  46. GARG AS , Rapelyea JA, Rechtman LR, Torrente J, et al
    Full-field digital mammographic interpretation with prior analog versus prior digitized analog mammography: time for interpretation.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1436-8.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  47. KIM SM , Kim HH, Kang DK, Shin HJ, et al
    Mucocele-like tumors of the breast as cystic lesions: sonographic-pathologic correlation.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1424-30.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  48. BERLIN L
    Documenting Instructions for Follow-up Imaging.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W849.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



    May 2011
  49. MARTINCICH L , Bertotto I, Montemurro F, Ponzone R, et al
    Variation of breast vascular maps on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI after primary chemotherapy of locally advanced breast cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1214-8.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



  50. LINDA A , Zuiani C, Lorenzon M, Furlan A, et al
    Hyperechoic lesions of the breast: not always benign.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1219-24.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  51. BERLIN L
    Mammographic CAD Markings: Archive or Discard?
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W659.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



  52. BALTZER PA , Dietzel M, Burmeister HP, Zoubi R, et al
    Application of MR Mammography Beyond Local Staging: Is There a Potential to Accurately Assess Axillary Lymph Nodes? Evaluation of an Extended Protocol in an Initial Prospective Study.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W641-7.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



    April 2011
  53. NARAYANAN D , Madsen KS, Kalinyak JE, Berg WA, et al
    Interpretation of positron emission mammography and MRI by experienced breast imaging radiologists: performance and observer reproducibility.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:971-81.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  54. NARAYANAN D , Madsen KS, Kalinyak JE, Berg WA, et al
    Interpretation of positron emission mammography: feature analysis and rates of malignancy.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:956-70.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  55. CARBONARO LA , Pediconi F, Verardi N, Trimboli RM, et al
    Breast MRI using a high-relaxivity contrast agent: an overview.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:942-55.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  56. DONG SL , Chu TC, Lan GY, Lin YC, et al
    Development of an adjustable model breast for mammographic dosimetry assessment in taiwanese women.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W476-81.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  57. PENG C , Chang CB, Tso HH, Flowers CI, et al
    MRI appearance of tumor recurrence in myocutaneous flap reconstruction after mastectomy.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W471-5.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



    March 2011
  58. ARGUS A , Mahoney MC
    Indications for breast MRI: case-based review.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



  59. ARGUS A , Mahoney MC
    Indications for breast MRI: self-assessment module.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  60. GUR D , Bandos AI, Rockette HE, Zuley ML, et al
    Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:737-41.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



  61. YOON JH , Kim MH, Kim EK, Moon HJ, et al
    Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:730-6.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  62. CHANG JM , Moon WK, Cho N, Han W, et al
    Management of ultrasonographically detected benign papillomas of the breast at core needle biopsy.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:723-9.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



  63. BERLIN L
    Should a radiologist be a referring physician?
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W349.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles   



  64. IUANOW E , Kettler M, Slanetz PJ
    Spectrum of disease in the male breast.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W247-59.
    PubMed     Text format     Related articles    Abstract available



Thank you for your interest in scientific medicine.


Amedeo is a Flying Publisher website.

   Design: